![]() ![]() Leaders must also acknowledge it is possible the U.S. ![]() prevails, the road to recovery in all categories will be uncertain and painful. Even in the best-case scenarios where the U.S. will lose men and women in uniform and some percentage of our tools of war, and the impact on the economy will likely be high. These non-negotiable criteria should be obvious, but Washington’s decisionmaking over the past few decades indicates that they are not, so laying out a rational, logical framework is necessary.įirst, American leaders must understand that any war in the modern age against a peer or near-peer is going to be costly. The legislative and administrative branches of government must meet a few requirements before choosing any war. Taiwan: Fundamentals to Influence Choose-Refuse Decisions for War In any circumstance short of a direct attack against our country, people, or allies, the United States should measure such decisions against the most rigorous criteria designed to ensure the security, viability, and prosperity of the country. has been attacked or is threatened with an imminent attack, and all diplomatic and peaceful means of resolving a conflict are exhausted. It should be an article of faith for any American Congress or president that the decision to fight a conventional war should only be taken under the most dire of circumstances - when the U.S. Beijing’s preparation for future combat continues to accelerate, and Washington must contemplate the pros and cons of fighting a war with China. China warns the visit is “like a gray rhino charging at us.” In China, this metaphor is used to indicate a big, obvious threat that needs to be dealt with.Īs that charged language indicates, tensions between the U.S. Taiwanese Vice President Lai Ching-Te, a 2024 presidential candidate, will visit the United States on Saturday to meet with American officials. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |